On 03/24/2015 06:05 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> > wrote: > >> Excerpts from Mark McClain's message of 2015-03-24 10:25:31 -0400: >>> >>> Echoing both Thierry and John. I support Mike’s decision to enforce the >> requirement. Maintaining drivers in the tree comes with responsibilities to >> the community and 3rd party CI is one of the them. Mike enforcing this >> requirement was the right action even if a hard one to take. >>> >>> mark >> >> Indeed. The deadlines were communicated clearly, and frequently. >> Making phone calls to reach out to contributors for issues like >> this is exceptional. >> >> +1000. Enabling contributors is great, but CI systems are an important > part of that enablement. I appreciate what Mike has done to drive Cinder > towards a quality level for all contributors here. It's a hard stance to > take, but saying "No" can sometimes be the right decision.
I'm just going to pile on. People keep asking us to focus on quality over landing features. It was the #1 request from EVERY operator at the recent Ops summit. This is one of that facets of doing that. It's hard, and it doesn't always feel good to all the parties involved - but it's important. Thank you, Mike, for sticking to your deadline. OpenStack will be better for it. "If it's not tested, it's broken" __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
