On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:23 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: > Some folks just will not respect other people's time. To pretend > otherwise is a huge dis-service to folks trying their hardest to > support those worthy of the support.
This may be true in general but I have yet to be convinced that this is the case. My impression is that the situation is more complex than just lack of respect for other people's time. > I'm really disappointed that there hasn't been more support for Mike > in this process. I've been supporting Mike in this decision and have not seen any element that makes me believe that Mike's position is not supported. Where have you seen lack of support? Going back to the point, in Paris I have been told that deadlines are hard to know. We've changed and this time you and Mike and cinder core and the whole Third-Party-CI team have been doing a lot more than in the past to keep people informed about deadlines, offering help, documentation, mentoring, etc. And still, that was not enough for some major members of OpenStack who failed to meet the deadlines. That's why I am *not* asking you or Mike what you can do better. I'm asking the folks at NetApp, Huawei and others to tell us what they think should be done differently. /stef __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
