On 03/16/2015 11:13 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > This thread is to follow up on our IRC discussion today. In today's > meeting we started discussing whether we want to pursue applying to move > under the OpenStack namespace and what pros and cons are. One concern > that was brought up was that our contributor base, being largely made up > of operators with many responsibilities, may not remain as consistent as > the contributors in other major projects. The counter to that was that > being a "real" project may increase the number of contributors we get. > > Another point of discussion was which projects to move, if not all of > them. How should we distinguish which projects are supported, and which > are "incubated" (or deprecated)?
I think we should evaluate our modules and define together which ones are well tested, widely-used so we can tag them "core" (ie: puppet-nova). Otherwise I would suggest using "incubating" tag (ie: puppet-gnocchi). > > Please raise your concerns and discussion points here. +1 for moving under the big tent. > > Colleen (crinkle) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Emilien Macchi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
