On 13 March 2015 at 09:43, Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/12/2015 09:35 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> On 13 March 2015 at 08:09, Ihar Hrachyshka <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 03/12/2015 11:38 AM, Boris Bobrov wrote: >>>> On Thursday 12 March 2015 12:59:10 Duncan Thomas wrote: >>>>> So, assuming that all of the oslo depreciations aren't going >>>>> to be fixed before release >>>> >>>> What makes you think that? >>>> >>>> In my opinion it's just one component's problem. These >>>> particular deprecation warnings are a result of still on-going >>>> migration from oslo.<package> to oslo_<package>. Ironically, >>>> all components except oslo have already moved to the new naming >>>> scheme. >>> >>> It's actually wrong. For example, Trove decided to stay on using >>> the old namespace for Kilo. >> >> Why? >> >> -Rob >> > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-meeting-alt/%23openstack-meeting-alt.2015-02-11.log > > starting from "2015-02-11T18:03:11". I guess the assumption was that > there is immediate benefit, and they can just wait. Though I don't > think the fact that it means deprecation warnings in their logs was > appreciated at the time of decision.
Thanks, reading that it looks like the actual status (oslo decided most definitely that namespace packages are going away, its just a matter of when) wasn't understood in that meeting. Is it possible to put it back on the agenda for the next Trove meeting? Cheers, Rob -- Robert Collins <[email protected]> Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
