On 3/12/15, 2:33 AM, "Carl Baldwin" <c...@ecbaldwin.net> wrote:
>John, > >I think our proposals fit together nicely. This thread is about >allowing overlap within a pool. I think it is fine for an external >IPAM driver to disallow such overlap for now. However, the reference >implementation must support it for backward compatibility and so my >proposal will account for that. I was proposing that the reference driver not support it either, and we only handle that use case via the non-pluggable implementation in Kilo, waiting until Liberty to handle it in the pluggable implementation. However, I don't think it's particularly harmful to do it either way so I am OK with this. Thanks, John __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
