-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2015 11:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have > official rules for that: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam where it says: "A > member of the team may be removed at any time by the PTL. This is > typically due to a drop off of involvement by the member such that > they are no longer meeting expectations to maintain team > membership". https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronCore "The PTL > may remove a member from neutron-core at any time. Typically when a > member has decreased their involvement with the project through a > drop in reviews and participation in general project development, > the PTL will propose their removal and remove them. Members who > have previously been core may be fast-tracked back into core if > their involvement picks back up" So, as Louis has mentioned, it's a > routine work, and why should we be any different? Also, I suggest > to write the same wiki document for Glance to prevent these issues > in the future. >
Does the rule belong to e.g. governance repo? It seems like a sane requirement for core *reviewers* to actually review code, no? Or are there any projects that would not like to adopt such a rule formally? /Ihar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU+GxdAAoJEC5aWaUY1u579mEIAMN/wucsahaZ0yMT2/eo8t05 rIWI+lBLjNueWJgB+zNbVlVcsKBZ/hl4J0O3eE65RtlTS5Rta5hv0ymyRL1nnUZH g/tL3ogEF0SsSBkiavVh3klGmUwsvQ+ygPN5rVgnbiJ+uO555EPlbiHwZHbcjBoI lyUjIhWzUCX26wq7mgiTsY858UgdEt3urVHD9jTE2WNszMRLXQ7vsoAik9xDfISz E0eZ8WVQKlNHNox0UoKbobdb3YDhmY3Ahp9Fj2cT1IScyQGORnm0hXV3+pRdWNhD 1M/gDwAf97F1lfNxPpy4JCGutbe5zoPQYLpJExzaXkqqARxUnwhB1gZ9lEG8l2o= =lcLY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
