On 02/24/2015 01:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Chris Dent wrote: >>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >>> >>>> need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, >>>> it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more >>>> resources >>>> to the teams impacted in that way. >>> >>> What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more resources >>> to teams? > > Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could > probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be > categorized as 'critical path') of Linux Foundation's "Critical > Infrastructure Protection Initiative"[1] to fund certain project > activities in need.
The OpenStack Foundation effectively already does this. In particular, the Foundation is helping fund critical horizontal efforts like release management, infrastructure, and community management. -- Russell Bryant __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
