Hello colleagues,

They say, there is some kind of "holywar" around the topic on if
fuel-client tests should rely on working Nailgun API without mocking
it. This is also connected with API stabilizing and finally moving
fuel-client to a separate library which may be used by any third-party
projects.

I just wanted to start this thread so everyone can share his opinion
on both Nailgun API stabilizing and further fate of fuel-client as a
separate library (how they do it in OpenStack projects).

Everyone is welcome to participate.

-- 
Best regards,
Nick Markov

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to