Without taking anything away from this fine and sensible direction, where _would_ be a good place to discuss more radical container-based deployments? (I'm fine if the answer is "use ad-hoc communication channels for now")
On Fri Feb 06 2015 at 7:24:12 AM Steven Dake (stdake) <std...@cisco.com> wrote: > > On 2/5/15, 10:41 AM, "Paul Bourke" <paul.bou...@oracle.com> wrote: > > >Hi Steve, > > > >Thanks for the update. For those interested in Kolla development and > >discussion, where is the best place to go? > > > >Regards, > >-Paul > > Paul, > > We hang out in the irc channel #tripleo on freenode. > > We use launchpad at http://launchpad.net/kolla > > We use the openstack-dev mailing list with the tag [kolla] > > Regards, > -steve > > > > > > >On 05/02/15 17:25, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > >> Hey folks, > >> > >> I wanted to provide a brief update on where we are headed with Kolla. > >> Initially Kolla began as a POC to show that containers could be used > >> to deploy OpenStack with the long term plan of integrating that > >> functionality into TripleO. That goal has not changed. > >> > >> The tripleo community wants baby steps not outright replacement of the > >> infrastructure as was proposed by using Kubernetes in Kolla as a > >> dependency in this review [1]. Our first step in this process will be > >> to create three new container types. We will create a controller node, > >> a storage node, and a compute node. We have proven that compute can be > >> used.[2] Further, one of our community members is working on a DIB > >> elements->container tool here [3] and we plan to use this along with our > >> other R&D in the area to integrate container tech into tripleo. > >> > >> I¹m not quite sure how it will all come together, but after numerous > >> discussions with folks from the tripleo and heat teams, I believe we can > >> find a path forward. > >> > >> Regards > >> -steve > >> > >> > >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144199/ > >> [2] > >> > >>http://sdake.io/2015/01/28/an-atomic-upgrade-process-for- > openstack-comput > >>e-nodes/ > >> _[3] _https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152017/ > >> > >> > >> > >>__________________________________________________________ > _______________ > >>_ > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> Unsubscribe: > >>openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > > >___________________________________________________________ > _______________ > >OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
