Miguel Ángel Ajo
On Wednesday, 4 de February de 2015 at 10:41, Cory Benfield wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:59:54, Kevin Benton wrote: > > I proposed an alternative to adjusting the lease time early on the in > > the thread. By specifying the renewal time (DHCP option 58), we can > > have > > the benefits of a long lease time (resiliency to long DHCP server > > outages) while having a frequent renewal interval to check for IP > > changes. I favored this approach because it only required a patch to > > dnsmasq to allow that option to be set and patch to our agent to set > > that option, both of which are pretty straight-forward. > > > > > It's hard to see a downside to this proposal. Even if one of the other ideas > goes forward as well, a short DHCP renewal interval feels like a very good > idea to me. > +1 I understand some dhcp-clients could ignore option 58, but yet, I understand they will obey the longer lease time, without affecting they behavior. So only who really needs it would take care of using fully compliant clients…
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
