+1 On 15 January 2015 at 14:46, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> wrote:
> +1 For adding Doug as Core in Neutron! > > I have seen his work on the services part and he is a great member of > the OpenStack community! > > Edgar > > From: Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team > > The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In > looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core > team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we > need to ensure cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 90 day period [2] > indicate some changes are needed for core reviewers who are no longer > reviewing on pace with the other core reviewers. > > First of all, I'm removing Sumit Naiksatam from neutron-core. Sumit has > been a core reviewer for a long time, and his past contributions are very > much thanked by the entire OpenStack Neutron team. If Sumit jumps back in > with thoughtful reviews in the future, we can look at getting him back as a > Neutron core reviewer. But for now, his stats indicate he's not reviewing > at a level consistent with the rest of the Neutron core reviewers. > > As part of the change, I'd like to propose Doug Wiegley as a new Neutron > core reviewer. Doug has been actively reviewing code across not only all > the Neutron projects, but also other projects such as infra. His help and > work in the services split in December were the reason we were so > successful in making that happen. Doug has also been instrumental in the > Neutron LBaaS V2 rollout, as well as helping to merge code in the other > neutron service repositories. > > I'd also like to take this time to remind everyone that reviewing code is > a responsibility, in Neutron the same as other projects. And core reviewers > are especially beholden to this responsibility. I'd also like to point out > that +1/-1 reviews are very useful, and I encourage everyone to continue > reviewing code even if you are not a core reviewer. > > Existing neutron cores, please vote +1/-1 for the addition of Doug to the > core team. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > [1] > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/051986.html > [2] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/neutron-reviewers-90.txt > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
