> On 14 Jan 2015, at 09:18, Przemyslaw Kaminski <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just made a general remark regarding why migrating to 2.7 is > profitable (I understood Bartek's question this way). > > The point about Red Hat guaranteeing security fixes to 2.6 is a good > one. Also, it's true we don't use SSL for fuelclient so yes, if other > OpenStack projects keep 2.6 we should stick to it also.
I have problems understanding this „SSL” case. It was just one example, and I mean security support in general. For me it does not matter that RH provides security fixes. They do it, because with their enterprise policies they need to. We could use their fixces, but in our case it would also require supporting other distros (Ubuntu for now). Regards, -- Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala Sr. OpenStack Engineer [email protected] __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
