Minwoo,
The cherry-picks for the contain-updater and object-updater back to
stable/juno are now available for review:
https://review.openstack.org/146211 and https://review.openstack.org/134082
Jay
On 01/08/2015 09:21 AM, Minwoo Bae wrote:
Hi, to whom it may concern:
Jay Bryant and I would like to have the fixes for the Swift
object-updater (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125746/) and the
Swift container-updater
(https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I7eed122bf6b663e6e7894ace136b6f4653db4985,n,z)
backported to Juno and then to Icehouse soon if possible. It's been in
the queue for a while now, so we were wondering if we could have an
estimated time for delivery?
Icehouse is in security-only mode, but the container-updater issue may
potentially be used as a fork-bomb, which presents security concerns.
To further justify the fix, a problem of similar nature
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/126371/(regarding the object-auditor)
was successfully fixed in stable/icehouse.
The object-updater issue may potentially have some security
implications as well.
Thank you very much!
Minwoo
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
