Inline ~sean
> On Jan 9, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote: > > sean roberts wrote: >> I like it. Thank you for coming up with improvements to the >> summit planning. One caveat on the definition of project for summit >> space. Which projects get considered for space is always difficult. Who >> is going to fill the rooms they request or are they going to have them >> mostly empty? I'm sure the TC can figure it out by looking at the number >> of contributors or something like that. I would however, like to know a >> bit more of your plan for this specific part of the proposal sooner than >> later. > > That would be "any OpenStack project", with the project structure reform > hopefully completed by then. That would likely let projects that were > previously in the "other projects" track have time to apply and to be > considered full Design Summit citizens. The presence of a busy "other > projects" track to cover for unofficial projects in previous summits > really was an early sign that something was wrong with our definition of > "OpenStack projects" anyway :) Got it. This is going in the right direction. > > Now I expect the TC to split the limited resources following metrics > like team size and development activity. Small projects might end up > having just a couple sessions in mostly-empty rooms, yes... still better > than not giving space at all. Agreed. I don't want to starve innovation at the summits. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
