On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 8:49 AM, McCann, Jack <jack.mcc...@hp.com> wrote:
> +1 on need for this feature > > The way I've thought about this is we need a mode that stops the > *automatic* > scheduling of routers/dhcp-servers to specific hosts/agents, while allowing > manual assignment of routers/dhcp-servers to those hosts/agents, and where > any existing routers/dhcp-servers on those hosts continue to operate as > normal. > > The maintenance use case was mentioned: I want to evacuate > routers/dhcp-servers > from a host before taking it down, and having the scheduler add new > routers/dhcp > while I'm evacuating the node is a) an annoyance, and b) causes a service > blip > when I have to right away move that new router/dhcp to another host. > > The other use case is adding a new host/agent into an existing environment. > I want to be able to bring the new host/agent up and into the neutron > config, but > I don't want any of my customers' routers/dhcp-servers scheduled there > until I've > had a chance to assign some test routers/dhcp-servers and make sure the > new server > is properly configured and fully operational. > > These are all solid reasons for adding this, and it makes sense to me as well. From a deployers perspective, these would be a big win. Given we have already filed a bug, hopefully we can get this addressed soon. Thanks, Kyle > - Jack > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev