On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Kyle Mestery <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Anita Kuno <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Rather than waste your time making excuses let me state where we are and >> where I would like to get to, also sharing my thoughts about how you can >> get involved if you want to see this happen as badly as I have been told >> you do. >> >> Where we are: >> * a great deal of foundation work has been accomplished to achieve >> parity with nova-network and neutron to the extent that those involved >> are ready for migration plans to be formulated and be put in place >> * a summit session happened with notes and intentions[0] >> * people took responsibility and promptly got swamped with other >> responsibilities >> * spec deadlines arose and in neutron's case have passed >> * currently a neutron spec [1] is a work in progress (and it needs >> significant work still) and a nova spec is required and doesn't have a >> first draft or a champion >> >> Where I would like to get to: >> * I need people in addition to Oleg Bondarev to be available to help >> come up with ideas and words to describe them to create the specs in a >> very short amount of time (Oleg is doing great work and is a fabulous >> person, yay Oleg, he just can't do this alone) >> * specifically I need a contact on the nova side of this complex >> problem, similar to Oleg on the neutron side >> * we need to have a way for people involved with this effort to find >> each other, talk to each other and track progress >> * we need to have representation at both nova and neutron weekly >> meetings to communicate status and needs >> >> We are at K-2 and our current status is insufficient to expect this work >> will be accomplished by the end of K-3. I will be championing this work, >> in whatever state, so at least it doesn't fall off the map. If you would >> like to help this effort please get in contact. I will be thinking of >> ways to further this work and will be communicating to those who >> identify as affected by these decisions in the most effective methods of >> which I am capable. >> >> Thank you to all who have gotten us as far as well have gotten in this >> effort, it has been a long haul and you have all done great work. Let's >> keep going and finish this. >> >> Thank you, >> Anita. >> >> Thank you for volunteering to drive this effort Anita, I am very happy > about this. I support you 100%. > > I'd like to point out that we really need a point of contact on the nova > side, similar to Oleg on the Neutron side. IMHO, this is step 1 here to > continue moving this forward. > At the summit the nova team marked the nova-network to neutron migration as a priority [0], so we are collectively interested in seeing this happen and want to help in any way possible. With regard to a nova point of contact, anyone in nova-specs-core should work, that way we can cover more time zones. >From what I can gather the first step is to finish fleshing out the first spec [1], and it sounds like it would be good to get a few nova-cores reviewing it as well. [0] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/priorities/kilo-priorities.html [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142456/ > > Thanks, > Kyle > > >> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-nova-network-to-neutron >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/142456/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
