On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/11/2014 12:55 PM, Andrew Laski wrote: > > Cells can handle a single API on top of globally distributed DCs. I > > have spoken with a group that is doing exactly that. But it requires > > that the API is a trusted part of the OpenStack deployments in those > > distributed DCs. > > And the way the rest of the components fit into that scenario is far > from clear to me. Do you consider this more of a "if you can make it > work, good for you", or something we should aim to be more generally > supported over time? Personally, I see the globally distributed > OpenStack under a single API case much more complex, and worth > considering out of scope for the short to medium term, at least. > > For me, this discussion boils down to ... > > 1) Do we consider these use cases in scope at all? > > 2) If we consider it in scope, is it enough of a priority to warrant a > cross-OpenStack push in the near term to work on it? > > 3) If yes to #2, how would we do it? Cascading, or something built > around cells? > > I haven't worried about #3 much, because I consider #2 or maybe even #1 > to be a show stopper here. > Agreed > > -- > Russell Bryant > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
