-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 27/11/14 12:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 11/27/2014 12:31 AM, Donald Stufft wrote: >> >>> On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I tried to package suds-jurko. I was first happy to see that >>> there was some progress to make things work with Python 3. >>> Unfortunately, the reality is that suds-jurko has many issues >>> with Python 3. For example, it has many: >>> >>> except Exception, e: >>> >>> as well as many: >>> >>> raise Exception, 'Duplicate key %s found' % k >>> >>> This is clearly not Python3 code. I tried quickly to fix some >>> of these issues, but as I fixed a few, others appear. >>> >>> So I wonder, what is the point of using suds-jurko, which is >>> half-baked, and which will conflict with the suds package? >>> >> It looks like it uses 2to3 to become Python 3 compatible. > > Outch! That's horrible. > > I think it'd be best if someone spent some time on writing real > code rather than using such a hack as 2to3. Thoughts anyone?
That sounds very subjective. If upstream is able to support multiple python versions from the same codebase, then I see no reason for them to split the code into multiple branches and introduce additional burden syncing fixes between those. /Ihar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUd0wMAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57gVMIAI70aQjReaa32WVJExL18c4t QfJ3U+4yGxURIwqu/VKfpujN+KNQ7JWR+zqSUpv1gGxRTQcwFYLLKeW9XRxBnETw 0YxLvCrju3MInFDCFZrJzm3mTMlnQSosQSoK08Phn++cyRs1R/isaWPU7UHMbiSM jIqRQkLYYPoSnhiTm1LkOoWg3oP82g3vxOPQmAlTAlx38lJ81ioBq7z9rRQzW+CX DcZy+64t+iePY9w0P4mvXdl/saDAlh7Hl/nu7RKcC5ycoa2un07N6SAazycMPvln naQvaXFfjPjGP5ToLNWIDwhRWmMkUa581ng37+6LewvbFNUDttKCHobp8cvVqy8= =d0S7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
