Hi, I would do both to compare. monit and Sensu have own advantages.
-- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski <pkamin...@mirantis.com > wrote: > We want to monitor Fuel master node while Zabbix is only on slave nodes > and not on master. The monitoring service is supposed to be installed on > Fuel master host (not inside a Docker container) and provide basic info > about free disk space, etc. > > P. > > > On 11/26/2014 02:58 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> >>> So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn, >>> configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the >>> physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"? >>> >>> Seems very complicated. >>> >>> If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed? >>> >> >> Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's used >> already? >> >> Best, >> -jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
