+1 for Option #2 On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes <lucasago...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Devananda van der Veen > <devananda....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As discussed in Paris and at today's IRC meeting [1] we are going to be > > alternating the time of the weekly IRC meetings to accommodate our > > contributors in EMEA better. No time will be perfect for everyone, but > as it > > stands, we rarely (if ever) see our Indian, Chinese, and Japanese > > contributors -- and it's quite hard for any of the AU / NZ folks to > attend. > > > > I'm proposing two sets of times below. Please respond with a "-1" vote > to an > > option if that option would cause you to miss ALL meetings, or a "+1" > vote > > if you can magically attend ALL the meetings. If you can attend, without > > significant disruption, at least one of the time slots in a proposal, > please > > do not vote either for or against it. This way we can identify a proposal > > which allows everyone to attend at a minimum 50% of the meetings, and > > preferentially weight towards one that allows more contributors to attend > > two meetings. > > > > This link shows the local times in some major coutries / timezones around > > the world (and you can customize it to add your own). > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20141125&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > > > For reference, the current meeting time is 1900 UTC. > > > > Option #1: alternate between Monday 1900 UTC && Tuesday 0900 UTC. I like > > this because 1900 UTC spans all of US and western EU, while 0900 > combines EU > > and EMEA. Folks in western EU are "in the middle" and can attend all > > meetings. > > > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=25&hour=9&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > +1 > > > > > > > Option #2: alternate between Monday 1700 UTC && Tuesday 0500 UTC. I like > > this because it shifts the current slot two hours earlier, making it > easier > > for eastern EU to attend without excluding the western US, and while 0500 > > UTC is not so late that US west coast contributors can't attend (it's 9PM > > for us), it is harder for western EU folks to attend. There's really no > one > > in the middle here, but there is at least a chance for US west coast and > > EMEA to overlap, which we don't have at any other time. > > > > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5 > > > > > > I'll collate all the responses to this thread during the week, ahead of > next > > week's regularly-scheduled meeting. > > > > -Devananda > > > > [1] > > > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2014/ironic.2014-11-17-19.00.log.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- *Intel SSG/STO/BDT* 880 Zixing Road, Zizhu Science Park, Minhang District, 200241, Shanghai, China +862161166500
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
