Hello, Duncan, Mike,

>>11:13 (DuncanT) <DuncanT> mtanino, You can and should submit the code even if
>>the spec isn't approved as long as it isn't looking contentious, but I will 
>>certainly take a look

Base on the comment at cinder__unofficial_meeting at Wednesday,
I posted both updated cinder-spec and the code.
Could you review the spec and code?

 Spec:  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129352/
 Code:  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92479/

The code is still work in progress, but most of functions are
already implemented. Please check whether the code doesn't break
existing cinder code.

For your reference, here are whole links related to this proposal.

 Blueprints:
  * https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/lvm-driver-for-shared-storage
  * https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/lvm-driver-for-shared-storage
 Spec:
  * nova:   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127318/
  * cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129352/
 Gerrit Review:
  * nova:   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92443/
  * cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92479/

Regards,
Mitsuhiro Tanino <mitsuhiro.tan...@hds.com>
HITACHI DATA SYSTEMS
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to