On 11/11/2014 05:47 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
On 11/11/14, 16:35, "Adam Young" <ayo...@redhat.com> wrote:
Recent recurrence of the "Why ios everything on its own port" question
triggered my desire to take this pattern and put it to rest.
My suggestion, from a while ago, was to have a naming scheme that
deconflicts putting all of the services onto a single server, on port 443.
I've removed a lot of the cruft, but not added in entries for all the
new *aaS services.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/URLs
Please add in anything that should be part of OpenStack. Let's make
this a reality, and remove the specific ports.
If you are worried about debugging, look into rpdb. It is a valuable
tool for debugging a mod_wsgi based application.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Is the reason subdomains aren’t being suggested because of the expense of
*.hostname certificates?
No, more due to the preponderance of all-in-one install options for
smaller deployments. Having one hostname per service should work just
as well, this being the more restrictive approach.
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
