+1. I think this is an important feature and I'd be happy to do reviews when needed - hopefully this can get in by Kilo! :)
On 11/08/2014 12:24 PM, Armando M. wrote: > Hi Miguel, > > Thanks for picking this up. Pull me in and I'd be happy to help! > > Cheers, > Armando > > On 7 November 2014 10:05, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majop...@redhat.com > <mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > Hi Yorik, > > I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit > about this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks > like a good moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so > we have a lot of headroom for testing during the next months. > > We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format. > > Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do > it right away. > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/ > -- > Miguel Ángel Ajo > Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig> > > On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com >> <http://www.nitrodesk.com>) >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik....@gmail.com >> <mailto:yorik....@gmail.com>] >> Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42 >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List >> [openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>] >> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap >> daemon mode support >> >> >> Hello. >> >> I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for >> rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1]. >> >> Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode >> for rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as >> well as sudo overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows >> 10x+ speedup of the rootwrap interaction itself. >> >> This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and >> Miguel gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for >> review [2], [3], [4]. >> The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2 >> left when oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's >> not the case and code in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting >> approved [5]. >> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889 >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787 >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667 >> [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386 >> [5] >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z >> >> -- >> >> Kind regards, Yuriy. >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
