On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Christopher Yeoh <cbky...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:25:49 +0400
> Oleg Bondarev <obonda...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Day, Phil <philip....@hp.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  I think the expectation is that if a user is already interaction
> > > with Neutron to create ports then they should do the security group
> > > assignment in Neutron as well.
> > >
> >
> > Agree. However what do you think a user expects when he/she boots a
> > vm (no matter providing port_id or just net_id)
> > and specifies security_groups? I think the expectation should be that
> > instance will become a member of the specified groups.
> > Ignoring security_groups parameter in case port is provided (as it is
> > now) seems completely unfair to me.
>
> One option would be to return a 400 if both port id and security_groups
> is supplied.
>

FWIW this is what has been implemented in Heat when such request is made
(see discussion on the bug report and [1])

Simon

[1]
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/heat/commit/?id=5c5e36de3737a85bec5023c94265e6bbaf6ad78e


>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to