Hi, Qiming Teng. Now all backends support events. So you may use MongoDB instead of MySQL, or if you like you may choose HBase.
Cheers, Igor. -- Igor On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Preston L. Bannister <pres...@bannister.us> wrote: > Sorry, I am jumping into this without enough context, but ... > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Qiming Teng <teng...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > wrote: >> >> mysql> select count(*) from metadata_text; >> +----------+ >> | count(*) | >> +----------+ >> | 25249913 | >> +----------+ >> 1 row in set (3.83 sec) > > > > There are problems where a simple sequential log file is superior to a > database table. The above looks like a log ... a very large number of > events, without an immediate customer. For sequential access, a simple file > is *vastly* superior to a database table. > > If you are thinking about indexed access to the above as a table, think > about the cost of adding items to the index, for that many items. The cost > of building the index is not small. Running a map/reduce on sequential files > might be faster. > > Again, I do not have enough context, but ... 25 million rows? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
