On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On 29 August 2014 04:42, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: >> On 08/28/2014 12:22 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > ... >>> The problem is that the setuptools implementation of namespace packages >>> breaks in a way that is repeatable but difficult to debug when a common >>> OpenStack installation pattern is used. So the fix is “don’t do that” where >>> I thought “that” meant the installation pattern and Sean thought it meant >>> “use namespace packages”. :-) >> >> Stupid english... be more specific! >> >> Yeh, Doug provides the most concise statement of where we failed on >> communication (I take a big chunk of that blame). Hopefully now it's a >> lot clearer what's going on, and why it hurts if you do it. > > So... FWIW I think I've got a cleaner implementation of namespaces > *for our context* - it takes inspiration from the PEP-420 discussion > and final design. It all started when Mike reported issues with testr > to me. > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1366869 I think you’ve got the wrong bug linked in here and your review, seems like you meant this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.db/+bug/1372250 _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
