Devananda van der Veen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: >> One is a technical discussion that has nothing at all to do with governance. >> The other is entirely about governance. >> >> If we are no longer incubating *programs*, which are the teams of people who >> we would like to ensure are involved in OpenStack governance, then how do we >> make that decision? From a practical standpoint, how do we make a list of >> eligible voters for a TC election? Today we pull a list of committers from >> the git history from the projects associated with “official programs", but >> if we are dropping “official programs” we need some other way to build the >> list. > > I don't think incubation ever applied to programs. Any program listed > in > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml > is "official" and gets voting rights starting in the election after it > was added to that file.
I confirm there never was incubation for programs. The only thing that goes through incubation are projects that want to become part of the integrated release. > I also don't think that Monty's proposal suggests that we drop > programs. I think it's suggesting the opposite -- we allow *more* > programs (and the projects associated with them) into the openstack/* > fold without requiring them to join the integrated gating of the > "layer #1" projects. Although the proposal might make them so cheap we wouldn't need a formal word for them. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
