Querying keystone for tenant names is certainly fair game. Keystone should be considered the only source of truth for tenant names though, as they are mutable and not globally unique on their own, so other services should not stash any names from keystone into long term persistence (users, projects, domains, groups, etc-- roles might be an odd outlier worth a separate conversation if anyone is interested).
Store IDs where necessary, and use IDs on the wire where possible though, as they are immutable. On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > A patch has come up to query keystone for tenant names in the IBM > plugin.[1] As I understand it, this was one of the reasons another > mechanism driver was reverted.[2] Can we get some clarity on the level > of integration with Keystone that is permitted? > > Thanks > > 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/122382 > 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118456 > > -- > Kevin Benton > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
