On 09/19/2014 01:15 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: > > On Sep 19, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> > wrote: > >> Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: >>> Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete >>> suggestions here. >>> >>> A couple more: >>> >>> 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually >>> represents what the goal of it is: Infrastructure Services? 2. >>> We need to be be open to having other Layer #1s within the >>> community. We should allow for similar collaborations and group >>> focus to grow up as well. Storage Services? Platform Services? >>> Computation Services? >> >> I think that would nullify most of the benefits of Monty's >> proposal. If we keep on blessing "themes" or special groups, >> we'll soon be back at step 0, with projects banging on the TC >> door to become special, and companies not allocating resources to >> anything that's not special. > > I was assuming that these would be self-organized rather than > managed by the TC. > > Vish > Some groups are able to self-organize better than others, I have been hoping the third party theme would self-organize for the last 10 months and while some folks are trying, their numbers don't keep up with the demand. This group insists that someone else tell them what to do. It is not a scalable model, it also doesn't inspire anyone outside of the theme to want to help out with the answering of questions either.
Just as a data point. Thanks, Anita. > > > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev > mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
