Hello everyone. >From what I can see in current neutron implementation, a tenant may organize its own network in following topology,
External Network <-> Tenant Router <-> Tenant Networks <-> Tenant Subnets <-> Tenant Instances This is a quite simple but efficient topology that should be enough for most common use in IaaS environment. >From the Neutron Concept section ( http://docs.openstack.org/havana/install-guide/install/yum/content/install-neutron.html , Chapter 9, Section 2), I see this statement, *"Each router has one gateway that is connected to a network and many interfaces that are connected to subnets. "* And its similar to the idea of a physical router. However, the current neutron restricts the gateway to a external network. So if this is a compromise related to the development schedule or a designed feature. If it's the latter, then by what reason we decided not to give tenants the freedom to control more of its network available topology. Thanks a lot.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
