Thanks a lot for a comments! As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or Stackforge isn't the best solution.
We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1] based on Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python library used in Cinder and Nova. I'll deprecate my oslo.storage GitHub repo and rename it to not confuse anybody in a future. [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Web Developer, http://blog.e0ne.info/, http://notacash.com/, http://kharkivpy.org.ua/ On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to Doug's comments. > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> > wrote: > > > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: > >>> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it > should > >>> be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted for use > >>> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder, > >>> right? If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit. We'd just > end > >>> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-) > >> > >> +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store > >> make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block Storage > >> program. > > > > I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give you > advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library needs to be > part of Oslo to be reusable. > > > > Doug > > > >> > >> Flavio > >> > >>> > >>> -Ben > >>> > >>> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > >>>> Hi Stackers! > >>>> > >>>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release. > >>>> > >>>> There're a lot of open questions for now: > >>>> > >>>> - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge? > >>>> - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements > >>>> - etc. > >>>> > >>>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try > it. I > >>>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's > only one > >>>> of the possible solution to start work on it. > >>>> > >>>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2]. > >>>> > >>>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just > a PoC. > >>>> > >>>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage > >>>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still > failed. > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e...@e0ne.info> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi All! > >>>>> > >>>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on > >>>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want > be > >>>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page. > >>>>> > >>>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to > discuss [3] > >>>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some > feedback > >>>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this > discussion on > >>>>> mailing list for all projects. > >>>>> > >>>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova > and > >>>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and > >>>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick > >>>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014 > >>>>> [3] > >>>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html > >>>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> @flaper87 > >> Flavio Percoco > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
