On 09/15/2014 10:21 AM, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:To arbitrarily restrict the user is a bug. QFT. This is why I don't feel like a blueprint should be necessary -- this is a fairly simple changes that fixes what's pretty undeniably a bug. I also don't see much consensus on whether or not I need to go through the interminable blueprint process to get this accepted. So since everyone seems to think that this is at least not a bad idea, and since no one seems to know why it was originally changed,
I believe I did: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/045924.html > what
stands between me and a +2?
Bug fix priorities, feature freeze exceptions, and review load. Best, -jay _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
