Thus, it get approved and added to the etherpad of doom. Michael
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote: > I looked at the Tempest change, it should be landable. I'll sign up for > review on these, as the rest of the patches are pretty straight forward. > > -Sean > > On 09/05/2014 06:32 PM, Michael Still wrote: >> So, this one is looking for one more core. Any takers? >> >> Michael >> >> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Day, Phil <philip....@hp.com> wrote: >>> The corresponding Tempest change is also ready to roll (thanks to >>> Ken'inci): https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112474/1 so its kind of just >>> a question of getting the sequence right. >>> >>> Phil >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] >>>> Sent: 05 September 2014 17:05 >>>> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FFE server-group-quotas >>>> >>>> On 09/05/2014 11:28 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>>>> 2014-09-05 21:56 GMT+09:00 Day, Phil <philip....@hp.com>: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to ask for a FFE for the 3 patchsets that implement quotas for >>>> server groups. >>>>>> >>>>>> Server groups (which landed in Icehouse) provides a really useful anti- >>>> affinity filter for scheduling that a lot of customers woudl like to use, >>>> but >>>> without some form of quota control to limit the amount of anti-affinity its >>>> impossible to enable it as a feature in a public cloud. >>>>>> >>>>>> The code itself is pretty simple - the number of files touched is a side- >>>> effect of having three V2 APIs that report quota information and the need >>>> to >>>> protect the change in V2 via yet another extension. >>>>>> >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104957/ >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116073/ >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116079/ >>>>> >>>>> I am happy to sponsor this work. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Ken'ichi ohmichi >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>>> >>>> These look like they are also all blocked by Tempest because it's changing >>>> return chunks. How does one propose to resolve that, as I don't think there >>>> is an agreed path up there for to get this into a passing state from my >>>> reading >>>> of the reviews. >>>> >>>> -Sean >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sean Dague >>>> http://dague.net >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> > > > -- > Sean Dague > http://dague.net > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
