On 09/05/2014 10:06 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 09/05/2014 06:29 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >> Scheduler: I think we need to split out the scheduler with a similar >> level of urgency. We keep blocking features on the split, because we >> know we don't have the review bandwidth to deal with them. Right now I >> am talking about a compute related scheduler in the compute program, >> that might evolve to worry about other services at a later date. > > -1 > > Without first cleaning up the interfaces around resource tracking, claim > creation and processing, and the communication interfaces between the > nova-conductor, nova-scheduler, and nova-compute. > > I see no urgency at all in splitting out the scheduler. The cleanup of > the interfaces around the resource tracker and scheduler has great > priority, though, IMO.
I'd just reframe things ... I'd like the work you're referring to here be treated as an obvious key pre-requisite to a split, and this cleanup is what should be treated with urgency by those with a vested interest in getting more autonomy around scheduler development. -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
