On 2 September 2014 15:27, Matthew Booth <mbo...@redhat.com> wrote: > We've been playing a game recently between oslo.vmware and the refactor > series where a patch from the refactor series goes in, requiring a > rebase of oslo.vmware daily. After a brief discussion with garyk earlier > I decided to head that off by rebasing the refactor series on top of > oslo.vmware, which has been sat in the integrated queue in the gate for > over 5 hours now. i.e. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will now go in > before anything else. > > Unfortunately, in doing that I have had to lose +2 +A on 4 refactor > series patches. I made a note of who had approved them: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/ > Brian Elliott +2 > John Garbutt +2 +A > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/ > Daniel Berrange +2 > Andrew Laski +2 > John Garbutt +2 +A > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/ > Brian Elliott +2 > Andrew Laski +2 > John Garbutt +2 +A > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/ > Brian Elliott +2 > Andrew Laski +2 > John Garbutt +2 +A > > These patches have been lightly touched to resolve merge conflicts with > the oslo.vmware integration, but no more. If people could take another > quick look I'd be very grateful.
If stuff was approved, and you have rebased, just reach out for cores on (or us) on IRC. Thats a general invite, particularly at this FF sort of time. Generally trying to to fill the ML with review requests. Cheers, John _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
