Sean,
class ResponseBody(dict):
> def __init__(self, body={}, resp=None):
> self.update(body)
> self.resp = resp
Are you sure that you would like to have default value {} for method
argument and not something like:
class ResponseBody(dict):
def __init__(self, body=None, resp=None):
body = body or {}
self.update(body)
self.resp = resp
In your case you have side effect. Take a look at:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1132941/least-astonishment-in-python-the-mutable-default-argument
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 10:08 AM, GHANSHYAM MANN <ghanshyamm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1. That will also help full for API coming up with microversion like Nova.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> wrote:
>
>> On 08/29/2014 10:19 AM, David Kranz wrote:
>> > While reviewing patches for moving response checking to the clients, I
>> > noticed that there are places where client methods do not return any
>> value.
>> > This is usually, but not always, a delete method. IMO, every rest client
>> > method should return at least the response. Some services return just
>> > the response for delete methods and others return (resp, body). Does any
>> > one object to cleaning this up by just making all client methods return
>> > resp, body? This is mostly a change to the clients. There were only a
>> > few places where a non-delete method was returning just a body that was
>> > used in test code.
>>
>> Yair and I were discussing this yesterday. As the response correctness
>> checking is happening deeper in the code (and you are seeing more and
>> more people assigning the response object to _ ) my feeling is Tempest
>> clients should probably return a body obj that's basically.
>>
>> class ResponseBody(dict):
>> def __init__(self, body={}, resp=None):
>> self.update(body)
>> self.resp = resp
>>
>> Then all the clients would have single return values, the body would be
>> the default thing you were accessing (which is usually what you want),
>> and the response object is accessible if needed to examine headers.
>>
>> -Sean
>>
>> --
>> Sean Dague
>> http://dague.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards
> Ghanshyam Mann
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
