On 28 August 2014 21:58, Chris Friesen <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 08/28/2014 02:25 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> On 08/28/2014 04:05 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >>> The overall "scheduler-lib" Blueprint is marked with a "high" priority >>> at "http://status.openstack.org/release/";. Hopefully that would apply >>> to sub-blueprints as well. >> >> a) There are no sub-blueprints to that scheduler-lib blueprint > > I guess my terminology was wrong. The original email referred to > "https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89893/"; as the "crucial BP that needs to > be implemented". That is part of > "https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/isolate-scheduler-db,n,z";, which > is listed as a Gerrit topic in the "scheduler-lib" blueprint that I pointed > out.
Yeah, its confusing. Those patches are meant for a different blueprint I assume. >> b) If there were sub-blueprints, that does not mean that they would >> necessarily take the same priority as their parent blueprint > > I'm not sure how that would work. If we have a high-priority blueprint > depending on work that is considered low-priority, that would seem to set up > a classic priority inversion scenario. What we do is this... If something high priority depends on something low priority, the low becomes high. Or more often, they both become medium. >> c) There's no reason priorities can't be revisited when necessary > > Sure, but in that case it might be a good idea to make the updated priority > explicit. If something looks like it has the wrong priority, just ping me, or one of the other nova-drivers, and we can discuss it. We did a bit of that at the mid-cylce meet up. Sometimes I just messed up, sometimes we didn't realise how important it is, sometimes we need to explain why the other things are considered more important right now. Maybe what I said before, but if you see a problem, please shout up ASAP, and lets get it sorted sooner, when its usually easier to sort it. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
