Sean Dague <s...@dague.net> writes: > On 08/27/2014 11:14 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: >> On 08/27/2014 04:31 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> 1. Do a partial rename and then complete it after the glance migration >> is done. If I'm not missing anything, we should be able to do something >> like: >> - Rename the project internally >> - Release a new version with the new name `glancestore` >> - Switch glance over to `glancestore` >> - Complete the rename process with support from infra >> >> 2. Let this patch land, complete Glance's switch-over using namespaces >> and then do the rename all together. >> >> Do you have any other suggestion that would help avoiding namespaces >> without blocking glance.store? > > I think those are the 2 paths. I think path #1 is completely sane. All > it will mean is that the repo name isn't exactly the package name, but I > think that's fine. We can take the repo name later in the release cycle. > So I'm really pro #1 if you can do that.
I'm happy to rename the project as early as this Saturday if that is convenient. I expect the system to be quiet enough for that by then. It would be helpful if some glance.store folks are around to expedite approval of any changes needed as a result of the rename before the rush begins again on Monday. -Jim _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
