On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:04:41AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > > > OK, now that we have evacuated the terminology issue (we'll use liaison > > or janitor or secretary, not czar), and side-stepped the offtopic > > development (this is not about suppressing PTLs, just a framework to let > > them delegate along predetermined lines if they want to)... which of > > those unnamed roles do we need ? > > > > In the thread were mentioned: > > - Bugs janitor (keep reported bugs under control) > > - Oslo liaison (already in place) > > - Security mule (VMT first point of contact) > > - Release secretary (communication with integrated release management) > > - Infrastructure contact (for gate and other infra issues) > > - Docs lieutenant (docs point of contact) > > > > Anita mentioned the "3rd party space" person, but I wonder if it would > > not be specific to some projects. Would it actually be separate from the > > "Infra contact" role ? > > > > Do we need someone to cover the QA space ? Anything else missing ? > > It seems the QA team is also feeling pressure due to the growing community, > so it seems wise to ensure every team has someone designated to help with > coordinating work on QA projects. >
Yes I agree, I was actually planning to start a liaison (I guess I'll have to come up with a different name...) system similar to oslo at some point soon. We discussed it during the QA meeting last week. [1] My plan was actually going to be starting a thread on that this week before Thierry beat me to it. -Matt Treinish [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2014/qa.2014-08-21-22.01.html _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
