On 08/25/2014 11:31 AM, Joe Cropper wrote:
Thanks Jay. Those are the same types of questions I was pondering as
well when debating how someone might use this. I think what we have
is fine for a first pass, but that's what I was poking at... whether
some of the abilities to add/remove members dynamically could exist
(e.g., I no longer want this VM to have an anti-affinity policy
relative to the others, etc.).
I guess what I was getting at is that I think the whole interface is
flawed and it's not worth putting in the effort to make it slightly less
flawed.
Best,
-jay
- Joe
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 08/25/2014 11:10 AM, Joe Cropper wrote:
Hello,
Is our long-term vision to allow a VMs to be dynamically added/removed
from a group? That is, unless I'm overlooking something, it appears
that you can only add a VM to a server group at VM boot time and
effectively remove it by deleting the VM?
Just curious if this was a design point, or merely an approach at a
staged implementation [that might welcome some additions]? :)
See here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/033746.html
If I had my druthers, I would revert the whole extension.
-jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
