On Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:05:28 PM Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 08/18/2014 03:38 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 14 2014, Yuriy Taraday wrote: > > > > Hi Yuriy, > > > > […] > > > >> Looking forward to your opinions. > > > > This looks like a good summary of the situation. > > > > I've added a solution E based on pthread, but didn't get very far about > > it for now. > > In my experience I would just go with the fcntl locks. > They're auto unlocked and well supported, and importantly, > supported for distributed processes. > > I'm not sure how problematic the lock_path config is TBH. > That is adjusted automatically in certain cases where needed anyway. > > Pádraig.
I added a "C2" (fcntl locks on byte ranges) option to the etherpad that I believe addresses all the issues raised. I must be missing something because it seems too obvious to have not been considered before :/ -- - Gus _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
