Edgar, you seemed to have +2'ed this patch on July 2nd [1]: " Edgar Magana Jul 2 8:42 AM
Patch Set 13: Code-Review+2 All looks good to me! I am not approving yet because Nachi was also reviewing this code and I would like to see his opinion as well. " That would suggest that you were happy with what was in it. I don't see anything in the review comments that suggests otherwise. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95900/ On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> wrote: > This is the consequence of a proposal that is not following the standardized > terminology (IETF - RFC) for any Policy-based System: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3198 > > Well, I did bring this point during the Hong Kong Summit but as you can see > my comments were totally ignored: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZbOFxAoibZbJmDWx1oOrOsDcov6Cuom5aaBIrupCD9E/edit > > I clearly saw this kind of issues coming. Let me quote myself what I > suggested: "For instance: "endpoints" should be "enforcement point" > > I do not understand why GBP did not include this suggestion… > > Edgar > > From: Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 10:22 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way > forward > > What I was referring to was also not Keystone's definition of an endpoint. > It's almost as if the term has many uses and was not invented for Keystone. > :-) > > http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsug_html_chunked/ChStatEndpoints.html > > Did a similar discussion occur when Heat wanted to use the word 'template' > since this was clearly already in use by Horizon? > > On Aug 6, 2014 9:24 AM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 08/06/2014 02:12 AM, Kevin Benton wrote: >>> >>> Given that, pointing to the Nova parity work seems a bit like a red >>> herring. This new API is being developed orthogonally to the existing >>> API endpoints >> >> >> You see how you used the term endpoints there? :P >> >> -jay >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
