On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 06:39:56AM -0700, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > This change: > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105501/ > > > > Tries to pull in libvirt-python >= 1.2.5 for testing. > > > > I'm on Ubuntu Precise for development which has libvirt 0.9.8. > > > > The latest libvirt-python appears to require libvirt >= 0.9.11. > > > > So do I have to move to Trusty? > > You can use the CloudArchive repository to get newer libvirt and > qemu packages for Precise, which is what anyone deploying the > Ubuntu provided OpenStack packages would be doing. > I am not a fan of this approach the patch above along with [0], broke Minesweeper [1] and Matt, I am worried that we will be breaking other folks as well. I don't think we should force folks to upgrade to a newer version of libvirt just to do some code cleanup. I think we should revert these patches. "Increase the min required libvirt version to 0.9.11 since we require that for libvirt-python from PyPI to build successfully. Kill off the legacy CPU model configuration and legacy OpenVSwitch setup code paths only required by libvirt < 0.9.11" [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58494/ [1] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/041457.html > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ > :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org > :| > |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ > :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc > :| > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
