> Sean Dague wrote: > > To be clear, the functional tests will not be Tempest tests. This is a > different class of testing, it's really another tox target that needs a > devstack to run. A really good initial transition would be things like > the CLI testing. > > Also, the Tempest team has gone out of it's way to tell people it's not > a stable interface, and don't do that. Contributions to help make parts > of Tempest into a stable library would be appreciated.
Well, in a perfect world, this "libification" of the re-usable bits from Tempest would be nicely advanced *before* the projects all rush in to implement their own in-tree functional testing mechanisms. But as we know, we all live in a highly imperfect world ... So do we expect the tempest-lib to be fleshed out in an emergent fashion, as the projects dig into implementing their own in-tree func tests? Or is it seen as an upfront seeding process, that the QA team members with Tempest domain knowledge are expecting to drive? Cheers, Eoghan _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
