On 07/25/2014 08:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/25/2014 07:48 AM, Bob Ball wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: 25 July 2014 12:36
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] "recheck no bug" and comment
Would that still allow us to only trigger 3rd party CI ? eg if we do
'recheck xenserver' I don't want to trigger the main CI, only the Xen
CI.
No, the 3rd party folks went off and created a grammar without
discussing it with the infra team (also against specific objections to
doing so). Such it is.
When setting up the XenServer CI the recheck syntax I added was requested by
reviewers and I certainly wasn't aware of these specific objections.
Do you have a proposal for the grammar you'd like 3rd party CIs to follow?
Consider: ^(recheck|check|reverify) off limits namespace.
If you want a namespace for commands specific to a 3rd party CI, that
should start with the 3rd party CI name.
^3rd party CI name: command
It should be the official short name in the system so there is no future
collisions issue.
Well, I apologize if I furthered the idea that 3rd party CI systems
should implement a "recheck $VENDOR" trigger. Sorry, I never knew they
were supposed to be off limits :(
-jay
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
