On 07/21/2014 04:16 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > Hi all! > > A quick note that SAD has passed. We briskly approved a pile of BPs > over the weekend, most of them vendor related as low priority, best > effort attempts for Juno-3. At this point, we're hugely oversubscribed > for Juno-3, so it's unlikely we'll make exceptions for things into > Juno-3 now. > > I don't plan to open a Kilo directory in the specs repository quite > yet. I'd like to first let things settle down a bit with Juno-3 before > going there. Once I do, specs which were not approved should be moved > to that directory where they can be reviewed with the idea they are > targeting Kilo instead of Juno. > > Also, just a note that we have a handful of bugs and BPs we're trying > to land in Juno-3 yet today, so core reviewers, please focus on those > today. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > [1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-2 >
Hi Kyle, Do we have guidelines for what can/should qualify as an exception? I see some exception requests and I would like to understand what criteria they should meet in order to qualify as an exception. Thanks ,Livnat > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
