On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Steve Gordon <sgor...@redhat.com> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Brent Eagles" <beag...@redhat.com> >> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> >> Hi, >> >> A bug titled "Creating quantum L2 networks (without subnets) doesn't >> work as expected" (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1039665) was >> reported quite some time ago. Beyond the discussion in the bug report, >> there have been related bugs reported a few times. >> >> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1304409 >> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1252410 >> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1237711 >> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1311731 >> * https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1043827 >> >> BZs on this subject seem to have a hard time surviving. The get marked >> as incomplete or invalid, or in the related issues, the problem NOT >> related to the feature is addressed and the bug closed. We seem to dance >> around actually getting around to implementing this. The multiple >> reports show there *is* interest in this functionality but at the moment >> we are without an actual implementation. >> >> At the moment there are multiple related blueprints: > > Following up with post SAD status: > >> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/99873/ ML2 OVS: portsecurity >> extension support > > Remains unapproved, no negative feedback on current revision. > >> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/106222/ Add Port Security >> Implementation in ML2 Plugin > > Has a -2 to highlight the significant overlap with 99873 above. > >> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97715 NFV unaddressed interfaces > > Remains unapproved, no negative feedback on current revision. > > Although there were some discussions about these last week I am not sure we > reached consensus on whether either of these (or even both of them) are the > correct path forward - particularly to address the problem Brent raised > w.r.t. to creation of networks without subnets - I believe this currently > still works with nova-network? > > Regardless, I am wondering if either of the spec authors intend to propose > these for a spec freeze exception? > For the port security implementation in ML2, I've had one of the authors reach out to me. I'd like them to send an email to the openstack-dev ML though, so we can have the discussion here. For the "NFV unaddressed interfaces", I've not had anyone reach out to me yet.
Thanks, Kyle > Thanks, > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
