On Fri 13 Jun 2014 10:51:24 AM PDT, Stangel, Dan wrote: > You can also refer to the example of Stackalytics, who have created > their own hierarchy and groupings for metrics reporting: > https://github.com/stackforge/stackalytics/blob/master/etc/default_data.json
It's a very neat grouping. It seems to me that the clients are grouped with their parent git/gerrit repo (nova with python-novaclient, under 'Compute' program) and Nova is shown alone. I don't see the python clients individual repositories or grouped: is that correct? For the quarterly reports I will need granularity because I believe that clients have different dynamics than their parent project (and if that proves not to be the case, we can remove this complexity later and merge data). can you share a concrete example of how you group things? -- Ask and answer questions on https://ask.openstack.org _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
