Keith, Have you put HTTP protocol in front of Kafka, or are you using Kafka¹s native protocol?
Can you also expand a little on your performance requirements? What does ³high throughput² mean to you in terms of the messaging patterns (# of producers and consumers, # of queues and queue partitions, message size, desired throughput)? Thanks, Tomasz Janczuk @tjanczuk HP On 5/31/14, 11:56 PM, "Flavio Percoco" <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: >On 30/05/14 06:03 -0700, Keith Newstadt wrote: >>Has anyone given thought to using Kafka to back Marconi? And has there >>been discussion about adding high throughput APIs to Marconi. >> >>We're looking at providing Kafka as a messaging service for our >>customers, in a scenario where throughput is a priority. We've had good >>luck using both streaming HTTP interfaces and long poll interfaces to >>get high throughput for other web services we've built. Would this use >>case be appropriate in the context of the Marconi roadmap? > > >Hi, > >Kafka would be a good store to back Marconi with. We've had some >feedback from the community w.r.t Kafka and there seems to be lot of >interest on it. The team is not currently targeting it but we could >probably do something after the J release. > >That said, Marconi's plugin architecture allows people to create >third-party drivers and obviously use them. It'd be really nice to see >some work going on that area as an external driver. > >Thanks, >Flavio > >-- >@flaper87 >Flavio Percoco >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
