On 4/25/2014 7:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Matt Riedemann
<mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
On 4/18/2014 1:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Nice work, Victor!
I left a few comments on the commits that were made after the original
history was exported from the incubator. There were a couple of small
things to address before importing the library, and a couple that can
wait until we have the normal code review system. I'd say just add new
commits to fix the issues, rather than trying to amend the existing
commits.
We haven't really discussed how to communicate when we agree the new
repository is ready to be imported, but it seems reasonable to use the
patch in openstack-infra/config that will be used to do the import:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78955/
Doug
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Victor Sergeyev
<vserge...@mirantis.com> wrote:
Hello all,
During Icehouse release cycle our team has been working on splitting of
openstack common db code into a separate library blueprint [1]. At the
moment the issues, mentioned in this bp and [2] are solved and we are
moving
forward to graduation of oslo.db. You can find the new oslo.db code at
[3]
So, before moving forward, I want to ask Oslo team to review oslo.db
repository [3] and especially the commit, that allows the unit tests to
pass
[4].
Thanks,
Victor
[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/oslo-db-lib
[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/GraduationStatus#oslo.db
[3] https://github.com/malor/oslo.db
[4]
https://github.com/malor/oslo.db/commit/276f7570d7af4a7a62d0e1ffb4edf904cfbf0600
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I'm probably just late to the party, but simple question: why is it in the
malor group in github rather than the openstack group, like oslo.messaging
and oslo.rootwrap? Is that temporary or will it be moved at some point?
This is the copy of the code being prepared to import into a new
oslo.db repository. It's easier to set up that temporary hosting on
github. The repo has been approved to be imported, and after that
happens it will be hosted on our git server like all of the other oslo
libraries.
Doug
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Are there any status updates on where we are with this [1]? I see that
oslo.db is in git.openstack.org now [2]. There is a super-alpha dev
package on pypi [3], are we waiting for an official release?
I'd like to start moving nova over to using oslo.db or at least get an
idea for how much work it's going to be. I don't imagine it's going to
be that difficult since I think a lot of the oslo.db code originated in
nova.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91407/
[2] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db/
[3] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.db/0.0.1.dev15.g7efbf12
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
